As promised, normal service is resumed, thanks to the mercifully slow legal system of this fine Kingdom of ours. As such, The Idle Spectator seeks to return to what might be called its grass roots, after months of conjectural articles on a variety of subjects which an impending legal process may or may not prove to have been slanderous, an editorial decision has been made in the highest of offices that this august journal return to its former raison d’etre, that of conjectural articles about politics.
It falls to TIS then to write upon that most light and fluffy of subjects, nuclear arms proliferation. The reason such a ephemeral and transient of subjects was chosen was because of the recent news that the comedy Bond villain state of North Korea recently claimed to have conducted its second successful test of such weapons to much finger wagging from the international community. Whether or not Mr. Jong Il in fact intends to hold the world to ransom remains to be seen.
With recent moves by the similarly cartoonishly evil Mr. Ahmadinejad of the Persian territories towards a similar end as well as the barbarians at the gate of the nuclear armed state of Pakistan, the threat of swift and merciful obliteration in the form of a fiery apocalypse (or a slow death from radiation poisoning for those less fortunate) is as close now as it was at any point in the cold war.
To top all this off, as if emergent nuclear powers were not enough, the great old enemy of the last sixty years has once more begun to rattle its sabre, the big red bear has awoken from hibernation in the time of an economic crisis so severe it might just lead to that third world war we’ve all been looking forward too. This might seem like something of a leaping assumption, the very weapons that have been becoming dangerously profligate of late are what prevents such a version of world politics, Putin will not pull a Mussolini and invade Abyssinia because of the threat of the bomb. Also it would be a logistical nightmare.
Or would he, perhaps nuclear proliferation, everyone possessing the power to destroy everyone else allows a man like Putin, who like the aforementioned, could come straight from the pages of Flemming, the leeway to do whatsoever he pleases, as his excursion to Georgia last year can be seen to demonstrate.
Had the on-line edition of this magazine been published at that time, then the astute reader would no doubt have picked up on a certain anti-Russian sentiment at that time, with articles published such as the classic Cossack Dogs Push on Georgia, Stupid Americans pack up trailer and head for Mexico, before reaching border and being told its a different Georgia that is being invaded. The headline writer was fired shortly thereafter. Nonetheless, that sentiment still exists here, and those in the corridors of power would do well to note our sage advice to never trust that dirty Cossack for a second, to never turn the cheek as we did last year and to answer action with action, rather than words.
This magazine does not advocate war as a positive choice, but it is occasionally a necessary one, as a tool of foreign policy the strategic deployment of troops is an underrated tool, certainly such a situation could easily spiral out of control and lead to a conflict the like of which the world has never known, a conflict that, had American troops engaged the Russians in Georgia, we could easily be in the midst of right now. However, the threat of action partnered with a demonstration of a willingness to engage in that action when necessary, would be a more effective tool of foreign policy than any economic sanction ever could be.
Come to think of it, that does sound like an avocation of war. So be it. War is hell, we recognise this, but suffering is the natural state of things, all forms of life are in conflict and this is a Nihilistic philosophical debate that will likely be picked up at a later date if I get that kind of depressed drunk that allows me to lucidly discuss such matters. If you would allow The Idle Spectator, we will put it this way, we do not think war is a good thing, just sometimes, more often than perhaps we may want to think, a necessary one.
Back to the matter at hand, the impending apocalypse. The threat of such obliteration comes not just from nuclear armed states, as if that weren’t threat enough, but also from groups of people that might actually be stupid enough to use such a weapon on a city like London. The kind of slavering maniac that we have been trying to figure out how to fight since Viet Nam.
Strength of arms failed, diplomacy never stood a chance, assassinations just replace one slavering maniac with another, letting them fight it out didn’t quite pan out, nor did letting them have a bit of land, letting them be crushed under an iron fist works for a while but people seem to object to that for some reason. TIS has no answers, other than to point out that blind passivity is no more efficacious than terrorism, objecting to further military action because of the failure of past operations jeopardised the security of our own nations as well as the lives very people who need our help the most.
If Iraq had not been such a monumental clusterfuck, which it would not have been if it had been fought rather than managed, then the American war machine could have been put to good use in Rwanda, or against the Lord’s Resistance Army, saving lives, albeit by killing those who would threaten the innocent, a step that is in the eyes of this diatribe, acceptable.
If you are really lucky the opinions of this journal on the situation in Africa, as well as Cossack imperialism, will be revisited along with nihilism at a later date.
Yours, The Idle Spectator.